Continue reading this article, and get more law firm business news and information, at FindLaw.com.
via Strategist http://blogs.findlaw.com/strategist/2014/12/5-new-years-resolutions-for-lawyer-introverts.html
Two workshops on legal aspects of blockchain technologies are scheduled to be held in January 2015 in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA:
Organizers of these events include Primavera de Filippi , Constance Choi , and Joel Dietz .
These workshops have been announced on the Website of the Berkman Center’s study group on Legal, Social, and Economic Aspects of Cryptoledger-based Technologies.
HT @compleatang
The event’s Website is available at: http://www.ash.harvard.edu/Home/Challenges-to-Democracy/Events/Hack4Congress
Click here for the registration page.
Sponsors of the event include Harvard Kennedy School Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, the OpenGov Foundation, the Sunlight Foundation, Congressional Management Foundation, Microsoft New England, Represent.Us, CODE2040, POPVOX, Capitol Bells, and Generation Citizen.
The hackpad for the event is at: https://hackpad.com/HackCongress-kiKLDML5Rr9
Projects to be worked on at the event are listed at: https://hackpad.com/Hack4Congress-kiKLDML5Rr9#:h=Challenges-and-Projects
Data sets, APIs, and examples of apps to be used at the event are listed at: https://hackpad.com/Hack4Congress-Potentially-useful-resources-SBHDs5XMV7Q
One Twitter hashtag for the event appears to be #Hack4Congress
Here is a description, from the event’s Website:
[…] Congress needs “fixes”—but where will these new tools and solutions come from? By bringing together political scientists, technologists, designers, lawyers, organizational psychologists, and lawmakers, #Hack4Congress will help foster new digital tools, policy innovations, and other technology innovations to address the growing dysfunction in Congress.
Help fix Congress! Join political scientists and policy experts, technologists, architects, and designers at #Hack4Congress at Harvard Kennedy School of Government to help identify ideas and innovations to overcome the dysfunction gripping much of Congress. “Hacking” is not just for technologists. “Hacks” include innovations in policy, architecture, organizational process, art and design, and educational materials, as well as new software and technologies.
Solutions presented at the end of the hackathon will be evaluated by a panel of judges. After a second hackathon hosted by The OpenGov Foundation on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. in spring 2015, the winning teams will have an opportunity to present their projects to lawmakers and other high-level officials inside Congress. Move our democracy forward.[…]
For more details, please see the event’s Website.
HT @FoundOpenGov and @hrgilman
Here are the important dates:
- Deadline for submission of abstracts (optional): January 9, 2015
- Deadline for submission of papers: January 16, 2015 (this deadline is hard)
- Deadline for submission of demonstration abstracts: January 23, 2015
- Notification of acceptance: March 13, 2015
- Deadline for submission of doctoral consortium papers: March 31, 2015
- Deadline for final revised and formatted papers: April 17, 2015
- Conference: June 8 – June 12, 2015
Here are excerpts from the call:
[…] Artificial Intelligence and Law is a vibrant research field that focuses on:
- Legal reasoning and development of computational methods of such reasoning
- Applications of AI and other advanced information technologies that are intended to support the legal domain
- Discovery of electronically stored information for legal applications (eDiscovery)
- Machine learning and data mining for legal applications
- Formal models of norms, normative systems, and norm-governed societies
Since it began in 1987, the ICAIL conference has been established as the primary international conference addressing research in Artificial Intelligence and Law. It is organized biennially under the auspices of the International Association for Artificial Intelligence and Law (IAAIL). The conference proceedings are published by ACM. The journal Artificial Intelligence and Lawregularly publishes expanded versions of selected ICAIL papers.
The field serves as an excellent setting for AI researchers to demonstrate the application of their work in a rich, real-world domain. The conference also serves as a venue for researchers to showcase their work on the theoretical foundations of computational models of law. Accordingly, authors are invited to submit papers on a broad spectrum of research topics that include, but are not restricted to:
- Formal and computational models of legal reasoning
- Computational models of argumentation and decision making
- Computational models of evidential reasoning
- Legal reasoning in multi-agent systems
- Knowledge acquisition techniques for the legal domain, including natural language processing and data mining
- Legal knowledge representation including legal ontologies and common sense knowledge
- Automatic legal text classification and summarization
- Automated information extraction from legal databases and texts
- Data mining applied to the legal domain
- Conceptual or model-based legal information retrieval
- E-government, e-democracy and e-justice
- Modeling norms for multi-agent systems
- Modeling negotiation and contract formation
- Online dispute resolution
- Intelligent legal tutoring systems
- Intelligent support systems for the legal domain
- Interdisciplinary applications of legal informatics methods and systems
ICAIL is keen to broaden its scope to include topics of growing importance in artificial intelligence research. Therefore, papers are invited on the following featured categories:
- eDiscovery and eDisclosure
- Open Data and Big Data
- Machine Learning
- Argument Mining
[…]
For more details, please see the complete call for papers.
HT Anne Gardner
John Sheridan of The National Archives has published Using Data to Understand How the Statute Book Works , Legal Information Management , 14, 244-248 (2014).
Here is the abstract:
The statute book is a large, complex system; a vast corpus of texts dating back to the thirteenth century, now evolving at a rate of around 100,000 words a month. The volume and pace of change combine with the constraints of current generation of digital tools to present a real barrier to researchers, limiting the type of research that is currently possible. The statute book is simply too big, and changes too rapidly, for any one person to easily comprehend. This situation is transformed if you view legislation as data, and then apply big data technologies and new data analysis techniques to that data. The aim of the Big Data for Law research project is to do just that; applying the latest analytical techniques to legislation, making it possible to research, interrogate and understand the statute book as a whole system. An important part of the initiative is to make available the raw data for conducting this type of research, alongside new tools and methods for working with the content. In this article, John Sheridan, Head of Legislation Services at The National Archives, sets out some of the ideas that underpin the project and describes the new service that researchers can use from Spring 2015.
Florian Martin-Bariteau of the University of Montreal has published The Matrix of Law: From Paper, to Word Processing, to Wiki , Lex Electronica , 19(1) (2014).
Here is the abstract:
Fifteen years ago, François Ost proposed a conceptual framework, known as the “word processing” model, to analyse and understand the evolution of law-making since the advent of the Information Society. This paper presents and discusses the accuracy of this model in the current context. Sketching out regulation as the new underlying logic of postmodern societies’ legal framework and networked law, the paper also draws attention to the phenomenon known as regulatory marketing. Arguing that law is now “in transit” and that the coherence of legal frameworks has been lost, the paper proposes to update François Ost’s word processing model to that of the Wiki, a utopic new paradigm to understand and produce law in the 21st century society.
The winning applications were:
All applications developed during the Open Law Project are listed at: http://ift.tt/1s6wG6Q
The Open Law Project Website is at: openlaw.fr/
The project was organized by la Direction de l’information légale et administrative (DILA), Etalab, and NUMA.
Data sets used during the project are listed at: http://ift.tt/1ze7CNI
One Twitter hashtag for the project was #openlaw
Click here for a storify of images and Twitter tweets of the awards ceremony held 17 December 2014.
Here is a description of the project, from the project’s Website:
Open Law est un programme de cocréation juridique organisé par l’Open World Forum (OWF), la Direction de l’information légale et administrative (DILA), Etalab et le NUMA et lancé le jeudi 30 octobre 2014 lors de l’Open World Forum 2014. Placé sous le signe de l’innovation et de lacollaboration, il a vocation a être alimenté durant toute une année par une multitude d’événements périodiques permettant d’approfondir, préfigurer et prototyper les différents projets et scénarios de services susceptibles d’être coconstruits.
Le programme s’appuie sur les jeux de données récemment diffusés en Open Data en France et a pour ambition de stimuler et dynamiser la réutilisation des données juridiques dans le cadre d’une innovation juridique collaborative et ouverte qui réunit le secteur public et privé.
Les objectifs de ce programme sont de :
- réfléchir à l’exercice, la place et les pratiques entourant le droit dans notre société numérique ;
- rendre plus accessibles certains jeux de données juridiques nouvellement ouverts ;
- créer une communauté de « hackers (coconstructeurs) du droit » ;
- mener des expérimentations autour du cadre juridique de ce type d’événement qui regroupe des acteurs de tout milieu.
Ce programme est ouvert à toute personne désirant contribuer, quelle que soit sa formation, son expérience ou encore ses compétences. […]
Click here for other posts about the project.
HT @dila_tweet
Mark D. Flood and Oliver R. Goodenough have posted a working paper entitled Contract as Automaton: The Computational Representation of Financial Agreements , on SSRN .
Here is the abstract:
We show that the fundamental legal structure of a well written financial contract follows a state-transition logic that can be formalized mathematically as a finite-state machine (a.k.a. finite-state automaton). The automaton defines the states that a financial relationship can be in, such as “default,” “delinquency,” “performing,” etc., and it defines an alphabet of events that can trigger state transitions, such as “payment arrives,” “due date passes,” etc. The core of a contract thus describes the rules according to which different sequences of event arrivals trigger particular sequences of state transitions in the relationship between the counterparties. By conceptualizing and representing the legal structure of a contract in this way, we expose it to a range of powerful tools and results from the theory of computation. These allow, for example, automated reasoning to determine whether a contract is internally coherent, and whether it is complete relative to a particular event alphabet. We illustrate the process by representing a simple loan agreement as an automaton.
Paul Lippe , Daniel Martin Katz , and Daniel H. Jackson have posted a working paper entitled Legal by Design: A New Paradigm for Handling Complexity in Banking Regulation and Elsewhere in Law , on SSRN .
Here is the abstract:
On August 5, 2014, the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation criticized shortcomings in the Resolution Plans of the first Systematically Important Financial Institution (SIFI) filers. […]
The Fed and FDIC identified two common shortcomings across the first 11 SIFI filers: “(i) assumptions that the agencies regard as unrealistic or inadequately supported, such as assumptions about the likely behavior of customers, counterparties, investors, central clearing facilities, and regulators, and (ii) the failure to make, or even to identify, the kinds of changes in firm structure and practices that would be necessary to enhance the prospects for orderly resolution.” We believe this regulatory response highlights, in part, the need for lawyers (and other advisors) to develop approaches that can better manage complexity, encompassing modern notions of design, use of technology, and management of complex systems.
In this paper, we will describe the information mapping aspects of the Resolution Planning challenge as an exemplary “Manhattan Project” of law: a critical enterprise that will require — and trigger — the development of new tools and methods for lawyers to apply in their work handling complex problems without resort to unsustainably swelling workforce, and wasteful diversion of resources. Fortunately, much of this approach has already been developed in innovative Silicon Valley legal departments and has been applied by leading banks. Although much of the focus of the Dodd-Frank Act is on re-organizing and simplifying banks, we will focus here on the information architecture issues which underlie much of what should — and will — change about how law is delivered, not just for Resolution Planning, but more broadly.
Among the topics discussed in the paper are the development of a new type of electronic contract, and the application of IBM Watson to complex legal information.
Pompeu Casanovas , Ugo Pagallo , Monica Palmirani , and Giovanni Sartor have co-edited a new article collection entitled AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems: AICOL 2013 International Workshops, AICOL-IV@IVR, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, July 21-27, 2013 and AICOL-V@SINTELNET-JURIX, Bologna, Italy, December 11, 2013, Revised Selected Papers (Springer, 2014).
Here are the contents:
Here are the contents:
More information about the event is available at the event Website.
HT @Radboud
Mary Lynn Young and Alfred Hermida have published From Mr. and Mrs. Outlier To Central Tendencies: Computational journalism and crime reporting at the Los Angeles Times , forthcoming in Digital Journalism .
Here is the abstract:
This study examines the impact of computational journalism on the creation and dissemination of crime news. Computational journalism refers to forms of algorithmic, social scientific, and mathematical processes and systems for the production of news. It is one of a series of technological developments that have shaped journalistic work and builds on techniques of computer-assisted reporting and the use of social science tools in journalism. This paper uses the Los Angeles Times’ Homicide Report and its Data Desk as a case study to explore how technological adaptation occurred in this newsroom in the early twenty-first century. Our findings suggest that computational thinking and techniques emerged in a (dis)continuous evolution of organizational norms, practices, content, identities, and technologies that interdependently led to new products. Computational journalism emerges from an earlier and still ongoing turn to digital within broader organizational, technological, and social contexts. We place this finding in the local, situated context of the Homicide Report, one of the first crime news blogs to adopt computational journalism in North America.
HT @hermida
The volume is co-edited by Serena Villata, Silvio Peroni, and Monica Palmirani.
Here are the contents:
SW4LAW 2014: International Workshop on Semantic Web for the Law:
JURIX-DC 2014: JURIX Doctoral Consortium 2014:
Prizes are scheduled to be awarded at an event to be held 17 December 2014 at DILA in Paris.
The Open Law Project is an extended legal hacking project, described in this post.
The projects developed during Open Law are listed at: http://ift.tt/1s6wG6Q
The Website for the Open Law Project, and the data sets used to develop these projects, are available at: openlaw.fr/
The Open Law Project has been organized by la Direction de l’information légale et administrative (DILA), Etalab, and NUMA.
One Twitter hashtag used for the event was #openlaw
Click here for a storify of images and Twitter tweets from the 11 December event.
Here is a description of Open Law Project, from the project’s Website:
Open Law est un programme de cocréation juridique organisé par l’Open World Forum (OWF), la Direction de l’information légale et administrative (DILA), Etalab et le NUMA et lancé le jeudi 30 octobre 2014 lors de l’Open World Forum 2014. Placé sous le signe de l’innovation et de lacollaboration, il a vocation a être alimenté durant toute une année par une multitude d’événements périodiques permettant d’approfondir, préfigurer et prototyper les différents projets et scénarios de services susceptibles d’être coconstruits.
Le programme s’appuie sur les jeux de données récemment diffusés en Open Data en France et a pour ambition de stimuler et dynamiser la réutilisation des données juridiques dans le cadre d’une innovation juridique collaborative et ouverte qui réunit le secteur public et privé.
Les objectifs de ce programme sont de :
- réfléchir à l’exercice, la place et les pratiques entourant le droit dans notre société numérique ;
- rendre plus accessibles certains jeux de données juridiques nouvellement ouverts ;
- créer une communauté de « hackers (coconstructeurs) du droit » ;
- mener des expérimentations autour du cadre juridique de ce type d’événement qui regroupe des acteurs de tout milieu.
Ce programme est ouvert à toute personne désirant contribuer, quelle que soit sa formation, son expérience ou encore ses compétences. […]
HT @b1jam
The conference Website and program are available at: http://ift.tt/1rljzku
The list of accepted papers is at: http://ift.tt/1D7ZFBx
Links to workshops and tutorials are at: http://ift.tt/1tKag0k
The Twitter hashtags for the conference include #jurix14 and #jurix2014
The Twitter account for the foundation that organizes the conference is: @jurixfoundation
Here is a description of the conference, from the conference Website:
For more than 25 years, the JURIX conference has provided an international forum for academics and practitioners for the advancement of cutting edge research in the interface between law and computer technology. […] We invite submission of original papers on the advanced management of legal information and knowledge, covering foundations, methods, tools, systems and applications. […]
One Twitter hashtag for the event was #legalhack
Click here for a storify of images and Twitter tweets from the event.
Here are the winners of the awards, according to a list sent by Rebecca Williams, co-organizer of DC Legal Hackers:
Top 10 Legal Hacks of the Year:
Click here for more information about the legal hacking movement.