Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality: Legal Trial, With and Without Mathematics, 30 May 2014: Links and resources

The 2014 Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality, on the theme: Trial With and Without Mathematics: Legal, Philosophical, and Computational Perspectives , is scheduled to be held 30 May 2014, at Stanford Law School, in Stanford, California, USA.

The conference is co-sponsored by CodeX: Stanford Center for Legal Informatics.

The conference Website is at: http://ift.tt/1nJzUgS

The conference program is at: http://ift.tt/1o4wPX7

Here is a description of the conference, from the conference Website:

DNA evidence and forensic science have once again brought mathematics into the courtroom. Numbers and statistics have helped distinguish the innocent from the guilty, but have also led to miscarriages of justice, for example, Dreyfus, Collins, Lucia de Berk. Is mathematics relevant in law at all? Do lawyers need mathematical training in statistics and logic? Can computers support legal decision making? This conference brings together experts in law, statistics, philosophy, and computer science to address these and related themes.

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers, Conference resources, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Bart Verheij, CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, Legal decision making, Legal decision making information systems, Legal decision support systems, Legal expert systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal logic, Modeling legal logic, Quantitative legal prediction, Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality, Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality 2014, Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality: Trial With and Without Mathematics: Legal Philosophical and Computational Perspectives, Trial practice information systems, Trial practice technology, Trial With and Without Mathematics: Legal Philosophical and Computational Perspectives



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/SZJdhp

TransparencyCamp 2014: Links and resources

Some legal informatics topics are scheduled to be discussed at TransparencyCamp 2014, being held 30-31 May 2014 at George Mason University in Arlington, Virginia, USA.

The conference Website is at: http://ift.tt/kmEwqr

The conference schedule is at: http://ift.tt/1lF6ayx

A live Webcast for Day 1 of the event is at: http://ift.tt/1o8I5lb

The Twitter hashtag for the event is #tcamp14

The Twitter account for the event is @TCampDC

Here is a description of the event, from the event’s Website:

TransparencyCamp is an “unconference” for opengov, an event where, every year hundreds of people gather to share their knowledge about how to use new technologies and policies to make our government really work for the people—and to help people work smarter with our government.

Filed under: Applications, Conference resources, Standards, Technology developments, Technology tools, Webcasts Tagged: #tcamp14, AKOMA NTOSO, Legal metadata, Legal metadata standards, Legislative communication systems, Legislative information systems, Open legal data, Open legislative data, Public contract information systems, Real property information systems, Standards for legislative communication systems, TransparencyCamp, TransparencyCamp 2014



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/SZJb9m

Lawyer Strike Flops, But Raise May be Coming Regardless

Court appointed work is rarely lucrative, but lawyers in Franklin County, Maine were so fed up with the ridiculously low rate in state cases that they agreed to do something about it: go on strike by refusing to take sexual...



Continue reading this article, and get more law firm business news and information, at FindLaw.com.



via Strategist http://ift.tt/1o7SXj8

Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality: Legal Trial, With and Without Mathematics, 30 May 2014: Links and resources

The 2014 Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality, on the theme: Trial With and Without Mathematics: Legal, Philosophical, and Computational Perspectives , is scheduled to be held 30 May 2014, at Stanford Law School, in Stanford, California, USA.

The conference is co-sponsored by CodeX: Stanford Center for Legal Informatics.

The conference Website is at: http://ift.tt/1nJzUgS

The conference program is at: http://ift.tt/1o4wPX7

Here is a description of the conference, from the conference Website:

DNA evidence and forensic science have once again brought mathematics into the courtroom. Numbers and statistics have helped distinguish the innocent from the guilty, but have also led to miscarriages of justice, for example, Dreyfus, Collins, Lucia de Berk. Is mathematics relevant in law at all? Do lawyers need mathematical training in statistics and logic? Can computers support legal decision making? This conference brings together experts in law, statistics, philosophy, and computer science to address these and related themes.

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers, Conference resources, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Bart Verheij, CodeX: The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, Legal decision making, Legal decision making information systems, Legal decision support systems, Legal expert systems, Legal informatics conferences, Legal logic, Modeling legal logic, Quantitative legal prediction, Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality, Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality 2014, Stanford Symposium on Law and Rationality: Trial With and Without Mathematics: Legal Philosophical and Computational Perspectives, Trial practice information systems, Trial practice technology, Trial With and Without Mathematics: Legal Philosophical and Computational Perspectives



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1o4wQtZ

TransparencyCamp 2014: Links and resources

Some legal informatics topics are scheduled to be discussed at TransparencyCamp 2014, being held 30-31 May 2014 at George Mason University in Arlington, Virginia, USA.

The conference Website is at: http://ift.tt/kmEwqr

The conference schedule is at: http://ift.tt/1lF6ayx

The Twitter hashtag for the event is #tcamp14

The Twitter account for the event is @TCampDC

Filed under: Applications, Conference resources, Standards, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: #tcamp14, AKOMA NTOSO, Legal metadata, Legal metadata standards, Legislative communication systems, Legislative information systems, Open legal data, Open legislative data, Public contract information systems, Real property information systems, Standards for legislative communication systems, TransparencyCamp, TransparencyCamp 2014



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1wxo6SS

A Salute to Shame Sentencing and the Judge Who Popularized It

Shame has long been a part of criminal justice, from sentences in the pillory and stocks to the modern mug shot. But our modern system has mostly lost its creativity, with jail, prison, probation, and occasionally drug treatment as the...



Continue reading this article, and get more law firm business news and information, at FindLaw.com.



via Strategist http://ift.tt/1jy2OLb

House Legislative Data and Transparency Conference 2014, 29 May 2014: Links and resources

The 2014 Legislative Data and Transparency Conference is being held 29 May 2014 at Capitol Visitor’s Center Auditorium, Washington, DC, USA.

The conference is organized by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration.

The conference Website is at: http://ift.tt/1jKRxg1

Click here for the conference program.

the Twitter hashtag for the event is #LDTC14

Here is a description of the event, from the conference Website:

The 2014 Legislative Data and Transparency Conference (#LDTC14) hosted by the Committee on House Administration will take place on Thursday, May 29, 2014, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in the Capitol Visitor Center Congressional Auditorium.

The #LDTC14 brings individuals from Legislative Branch agencies together with data users and transparency advocates to foster a conversation about the use of legislative data — addressing how agencies use technology well and how they can use it better in the future.

HT Reynold Schweickhardt

Filed under: Applications, Conference Announcements, Conference resources, Data sets, Policy debates, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: #LDTC14, Free access to law, Free access to legislative data, House Legislative Data and Transparency Conference, House Legislative Data and Transparency Conference 2014, LDTC, LDTC 2014, Legal informatics conferences, Legislative Data and Transparency Conference, Legislative Data and Transparency Conference 2014, Legislative information systems, Open legal data, Open legislative data, Public access to legal information, Public access to legislative information, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/REwMpP

Flyntz: Expanding the Use of Perma.cc

Matthew Flyntz, JD, of the University of Washington has posted Ever Onward: Expanding the Use of Perma.cc .

Here is the abstract:

The related problems of link rot and reference rot are plaguing legal citations, and until now, legal academics have not had an adequate tool to combat these problems. Perma.cc is a free service that allows authors or members of law journals to create permanent citations to online resources. This article argues that we should expand the use of Perma.cc to capture material that would otherwise be inaccessible behind “paywalls” and material that the Bluebook would require authors to cite in print or “as if” in print. These expansions would be relatively simple to implement now and would greatly enhance the utility of legal citations. Finally, this article suggests three areas in which Perma.cc might expand in the future: expanding Perma.cc beyond law schools, using Perma.cc as a legal blog repository, and using Perma.cc to capture images of print-only materials.

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Projects, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Access to legal scholarship, Identifiers for legal blogs, Legal blogs, Legal identifiers, Legal scholarship, Legal social media, Link rot in legal resources, Matthew Flyntz, Perma.cc, Preservation of digital legal information, Preservation of electronic legal information, Preservation of legal blogs, Preservation of legal information, Preservation of legal resources, Public access to legal scholarship, PURLs for legal resources



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1pmEDr0

Flyntz: Expanding the Use of Perma.cc

Matthew Flyntz, JD, of the University of Washington has posted Ever Onward: Expanding the Use of Perma.cc .

Here is the abstract:

The related problems of link rot and reference rot are plaguing legal citations, and until now, legal academics have not had an adequate tool to combat these problems. Perma.cc is a free service that allows authors or members of law journals to create permanent citations to online resources. This article argues that we should expand the use of Perma.cc to capture material that would otherwise be inaccessible behind “paywalls” and material that the Bluebook would require authors to cite in print or “as if” in print. These expansions would be relatively simple to implement now and would greatly enhance the utility of legal citations. Finally, this article suggests three areas in which Perma.cc might expand in the future: expanding Perma.cc beyond law schools, using Perma.cc as a legal blog repository, and using Perma.cc to capture images of print-only materials.

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Projects, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Access to legal scholarship, Identifiers for legal blogs, Legal blogs, Legal identifiers, Legal scholarship, Legal social media, Link rot in legal resources, Matthew Flyntz, Perma.cc, Preservation of digital legal information, Preservation of electronic legal information, Preservation of legal blogs, Preservation of legal information, Preservation of legal resources, Public access to legal scholarship, PURLs for legal resources



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1gCJRvX

House Legislative Data and Transparency Conference 2014, 29 May 2014: Links and resources

The 2014 Legislative Data and Transparency Conference is being held 29 May 2014 at the Capitol Visitor’s Center Auditorium, Washington, DC, USA.

The conference is organized by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration.

The conference Website is at: http://ift.tt/1jKRxg1

Click here for the conference program.

the Twitter hashtag for the event is #LDTC14

Here is a description of the event, from the conference Website:

The 2014 Legislative Data and Transparency Conference (#LDTC14) hosted by the Committee on House Administration will take place on Thursday, May 29, 2014, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in the Capitol Visitor Center Congressional Auditorium.

The #LDTC14 brings individuals from Legislative Branch agencies together with data users and transparency advocates to foster a conversation about the use of legislative data — addressing how agencies use technology well and how they can use it better in the future.

HT Reynold Schweickhardt

Filed under: Applications, Conference Announcements, Conference resources, Data sets, Policy debates, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: #LDTC14, Free access to law, Free access to legislative data, House Legislative Data and Transparency Conference, House Legislative Data and Transparency Conference 2014, LDTC, LDTC 2014, Legal informatics conferences, Legislative Data and Transparency Conference, Legislative Data and Transparency Conference 2014, Legislative information systems, Open legal data, Open legislative data, Public access to legal information, Public access to legislative information, U.S. House of Representatives Committee on House Administration



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1nwgNJs

Petulant Prosecutor's Refusal to Participate Means Double Jeopardy

Esteban Martinez is a free man, and he may have a petulant prosecutor to thank. When Martinez's two alleged victims were no shows at his much-delayed and oft-rescheduled felony trial, the court finally lost patience, after nearly five years of...



Continue reading this article, and get more law firm business news and information, at FindLaw.com.



via Strategist http://ift.tt/1k1GLlY

Open Legislative Data in Paris II: Time has come for Law Tracking: Conference, 28 May 2014: Links and resources

Open Legislative Data in Paris II: Time has come for Law Tracking , a conference, is being held 28 May 2014 at Sciences Po in Paris.

The conference is being organized by La Fabrique de la Loi (The Law Factory Project), whose participants include Regards Citoyens and Sciences Po.

Click here for the conference program.

The Twitter hashtag for the event is #lawiscode

The API for data from the French national parliament being discussed at the event is at: http://ift.tt/1kerV5M

Here is a description of the conference, from the conference Website:

We welcome proposals on any aspects of law tracking in parliaments linked to the use of computer science, be it in order to present existing projects, to explore new tools, to discuss their effects, to analyze legislatures through open parliamentary data…

Special attention will be given to the following areas:

• The technical challenges of tracking bills in parliaments. How do we deal with missing data? Should committees and floor amendments be treated the same? How do we connect the versions of the bills with the mountains of amendments? What should be done with the so numerous failed amendments?


• The esthetical challenges of tracking bills in parliaments. Which kind of visualization is optimal for making sense of a process as manifold as law making? Where should the focus be placed? How can digital design help?


• The ethical challenges of tracking bills in parliaments. Does the treatment of big corpora of legislative data really tell us something about the quality of a given democracy? Is it possible, for instance, to specify patterns of lobbying through law tracking?

This conference follows on a 2012 conference: Open Legislative Data in Paris: A Conference of the Third Kind with Hacktivists and Academics .

HT @parltrack

Filed under: APIs, Applications, Articles and papers, Conference Announcements, Conference resources, Data sets, Policy debates, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: #lawiscode, Analysis of legislative big data, Big data and analysis of legislative data, Big data and law, Big data and legislation, Big legislative data, Bill tracking systems, Citizens' participation in lawmaking, eparticipation, eparticipation systems, Free access to law, Free access to legislative data, La fabrique de la loi, Law Factory, Law tracking, Legal big data, Legal informatics conferences, Legislative big data, Legislative information systems, Legislative monitoring, Legislative tracking, Legislative tracking services, Legislative tracking systems, Open legal data, Open legislative data, Open Legislative Data in Paris II: Time has come for Law Tracking, Parliamentary monitoring, Parliamentary monitoring organizations, Public access to legal information, Public access to legislative data, Public access to legislative information, Regards Citoyens, Sciences Po, Visualization of legal information, Visualization of legislative data, Visualization of legislative information



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1k41158

Sen et al.: LEGALEASE: New programming language for modeling privacy policies

Shayak Sen , Saikat Guha , Anupam Datta , Sriram K. Rajamani , Janice Tsai , and Jeannette M. Wing , presented a paper entitled Bootstrapping Privacy Compliance in Big Data Systems , at IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2014, 19-21 May 2014 in San Jose, California, USA.

Here is the abstract:

With the rapid increase in cloud services collecting and using user data to offer personalized experiences, ensuring that these services comply with their privacy policies has become a business imperative for building user trust. However, most compliance efforts in industry today rely on manual review processes and audits designed to safeguard user data, and therefore are resource intensive and lack coverage. In this paper, we present our experience building and operating a system to automate privacy policy compliance checking in Bing. Central to the design of the system are (a) LEGALEASE — a language that allows specification of privacy policies that impose restrictions on how user data is handled; and (b) GROK — a data inventory for Map-Reduce-like big data systems that tracks how user data flows among programs. GROK maps code-level schema elements to datatypes in LEGALEASE, in essence, annotating existing programs with information flow types with minimal human input. Compliance checking is thus reduced to information flow analysis of big data systems. The system, bootstrapped by a small team, checks compliance daily of millions of lines of ever-changing source code written by several thousand developers.

The paper is discussed in a new post by Derrick Harris at GigaOm : New Microsoft privacy framework lets lawyers, developers and their code speak the same language .

HT @LegalHackers

Filed under: Applications, Software, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Anupam Datta, Derrick Harris, GigaOm, GROK, IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2014, Janice Tsai, Jeannette M. Wing, Legal compliance information systems, Legal compliance systems, LEGALEASE, Modeling legal rules, Modeling policies, Modeling privacy law rules, Policy modeling, Privacy law compliance information systems, Privacy law compliance systems, Privacy law information systems, Saikat Guha, Shayak Sen, Sriram K. Rajamani



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1moRfZL

Open Legislative Data in Paris II: Time has come for Law Tracking: Conference, 28 May 2014: Links and resources

Open Legislative Data in Paris II: Time has come for Law Tracking , a conference, is being held 28 May 2014 at Sciences Po in Paris.

The conference is being organized by La Fabrique de la Loi (The Law Factory Project), whose participants include Regards Citoyens and Sciences Po.

Click here for the conference program.

The Twitter hashtag for the event is #lawiscode

The API for data from the French national parliament being discussed at the event is at: http://ift.tt/1kerV5M

This conference follows on a 2012 conference: Open Legislative Data in Paris: A Conference of the Third Kind with Hacktivists and Academics .

HT @parltrack

Filed under: APIs, Applications, Articles and papers, Conference Announcements, Conference resources, Data sets, Policy debates, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: #lawiscode, Bill tracking systems, Citizens' participation in lawmaking, eparticipation, eparticipation systems, Free access to law, Free access to legislative data, La fabrique de la loi, Law Factory, Legal informatics conferences, Legislative information systems, Open legal data, Open legislative data, Open Legislative Data in Paris II: Time has come for Law Tracking, Public access to legal information, Public access to legislative data, Public access to legislative information, Regards Citoyens, Sciences Po, Visualization of legal information



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1kerY1l

Sen et al.: LEGALEASE: New programming language for modeling privacy policies

Shayak Sen , Saikat Guha , Anupam Datta , Sriram K. Rajamani , Janice Tsai , and Jeannette M. Wing , presented a paper entitled Bootstrapping Privacy Compliance in Big Data Systems , at IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2014, 19-21 May 2014 in San Jose, California, USA.

Here is the abstract:

With the rapid increase in cloud services collecting and using user data to offer personalized experiences, ensuring that these services comply with their privacy policies has become a business imperative for building user trust. However, most compliance efforts in industry today rely on manual review processes and audits designed to safeguard user data, and therefore are resource intensive and lack coverage. In this paper, we present our experience building and operating a system to automate privacy policy compliance checking in Bing. Central to the design of the system are (a) LEGALEASE — a language that allows specification of privacy policies that impose restrictions on how user data is handled; and (b) GROK — a data inventory for Map-Reduce-like big data systems that tracks how user data flows among programs. GROK maps code-level schema elements to datatypes in LEGALEASE, in essence, annotating existing programs with information flow types with minimal human input. Compliance checking is thus reduced to information flow analysis of big data systems. The system, bootstrapped by a small team, checks compliance daily of millions of lines of ever-changing source code written by several thousand developers.

The paper is discussed in a new post by Derrick Harris at GigaOm : New Microsoft privacy framework lets lawyers, developers and their code speak the same language .

HT @LegalHackers

Filed under: Applications, Software, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Anupam Datta, Derrick Harris, GigaOm, GROK, IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2014, Janice Tsai, Jeannette M. Wing, Legal compliance information systems, Legal compliance systems, LEGALEASE, Modeling legal rules, Modeling policies, Modeling privacy law rules, Policy modeling, Privacy law compliance information systems, Privacy law compliance systems, Privacy law information systems, Saikat Guha, Shayak Sen, Sriram K. Rajamani



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1pif4XP

Judge Randall Rader's Resignation And Judicial Ethics Basics

Patent reform crusader and Federal Circuit Chief Judge Randall Rader will no longer be chief, after an ethics mini-scandal involving a complementary letter to a friend who appeared before the court in recent cases. The court initially issued recusals and...



Continue reading this article, and get more law firm business news and information, at FindLaw.com.



via Strategist http://ift.tt/1tkaVQR

Greenwood et al.: The New Deal on Data: A Framework for Institutional Controls

Dazza Greenwood , Arkadiusz Stopczynski , Brian Sweatt , Thomas Hardjono , and Alex Pentland , have published The New Deal on Data: A Framework for Institutional Controls , in Julia Lane et al. (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

The chapter describes an approach for giving ordinary people increased control over their personal data, primarily by means of trust networks.

The chapter discusses legal informatics in connection with open Personal Data Store (openPDS), “trust network for computational law,” and UMA (User Managed Access).

Here are two resources on UMA, cited in the chapter:

• The UMA specification: Thomas Hardjono, User-Managed Access (UMA) Profile of OAuth 2.0


• A memo setting out the UMA contractual framework: Eve Maler and Thomas Hardjono: Binding Obligations on User-Managed Access (UMA) Participants

Click here for an earlier post on openPDS.

HT Dazza Greenwood

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Chapters, Policy debates, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Alex Pentland, Arkadiusz Stopczynski, Big data and law, Binding Obligations on User-Managed Access (UMA) Participants, Brian Sweatt, Data privacy, Data privacy information systems, Dazza Greenwood, econtract systems, econtracting systems, econtracts, Eve Maler, Information privacy, Informational privacy, Informational privacy information systems, Julia Lane, Legal trust networks, Modeling contract terms, Modeling contracts, Modeling legal rules, Modeling privacy law rules, open Personal Data Store, openPDS, Privacy Big Data and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement, Privacy law information systems, Thomas Hardjono, Trust network for computational law, Trust networks, UMA, User Managed Access, User-Managed Access (UMA) Profile of OAuth 2.0



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1tjoAaZ

Legal informatics papers at ACM SIGIR 2014

Some papers on legal informatics have been accepted for ACM SIGIR 2014 (the conference of the ACM information retrieval special interest group), being held 6-11 July 2014 in Broadbeach, Queensland, Australia:

• Gordon V. Cormack and Maura R. Grossman: Evaluation of Machine Learning Protocols for Technology-Assisted Review in Electronic Discovery


• Jyothi Vinjumur, Douglas W Oard, and Jiaul Paik: Assessing the Usability and Reusability of an E-Discovery Privilege Test Collection

In addition, Cheng Li says that the approach described in the following paper is applicable to legal information retrieval:

• Cheng Li, Yue Wang, Paul Resnick, and Qiaozhu Mei (all of the University of Michigan): ReQ-ReC: High Recall Retrieval with Query Pooling and Interactive Classification

For abstracts and full text of papers, please contact the authors.

If you know of other legal informatics papers or posters that have been accepted for the conference, please feel free to mention them in the comments to this post.

HT Cheng Li

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers, Research findings, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: ACM SIGIR, ACM SIGIR 2014, Automated classification of legal documents, Cheng Li, Douglas Oard, Douglas W. Oard, ediscovery, ediscovery and legal information retrieval, Electronic discovery, Gordon Cormack, Gordon V. Cormack, Jiaul Paik, Jyothi Vinjumur, Legal information retrieval, Legal machine learning, Legal search, Machine learning and ediscovery, Machine learning and law, Machine learning and legal information retrieval, Maura Grossman, Maura R. Grossman, Paul Resnick, Qiaozhu Mei, Technology assisted review in ediscovery, Yue Wang



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/TR2ceT

Greenwood et al.: The New Deal on Data: A Framework for Institutional Controls

Dazza Greenwood , Arkadiusz Stopczynski , Brian Sweatt , Thomas Hardjono , and Alex Pentland , have published The New Deal on Data: A Framework for Institutional Controls , in Julia Lane et al. (Eds.), Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement (Cambridge University Press, 2014).

The chapter describes an approach for giving ordinary people increased control over their personal data, primarily by means of trust networks.

The chapter discusses legal informatics in connection with open Personal Data Store (openPDS), “trust network for computational law,” and UMA (User Managed Access).

Here are two resources on UMA, cited in the chapter:

• The UMA specification: Thomas Hardjono, User-Managed Access (UMA) Profile of OAuth 2.0


• A memo setting out the UMA contractual framework: Eve Maler and Thomas Hardjono: Binding Obligations on User-Managed Access (UMA) Participants

Click here for an earlier post on openPDS.

HT Dazza Greenwood

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Chapters, Policy debates, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Alex Pentland, Arkadiusz Stopczynski, Big data and law, Binding Obligations on User-Managed Access (UMA) Participants, Brian Sweatt, Data privacy, Data privacy information systems, Dazza Greenwood, econtract systems, econtracting systems, econtracts, Eve Maler, Information privacy, Informational privacy, Informational privacy information systems, Julia Lane, Legal trust networks, Modeling contract terms, Modeling contracts, Modeling legal rules, Modeling privacy law rules, open Personal Data Store, openPDS, Privacy Big Data and the Public Good: Frameworks for Engagement, Privacy law information systems, Thomas Hardjono, Trust network for computational law, Trust networks, UMA, User Managed Access, User-Managed Access (UMA) Profile of OAuth 2.0



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1mjaLqg

Legal informatics papers at ACM SIGIR 2014

Some papers on legal informatics have been accepted for ACM SIGIR 2014 (the conference of the ACM information retrieval special interest group), being held 6-11 July 2014 in Broadbeach, Queensland, Australia:

• Gordon V. Cormack and Maura R. Grossman: Evaluation of Machine Learning Protocols for Technology-Assisted Review in Electronic Discovery


• Jyothi Vinjumur, Douglas W Oard, and Jiaul Paik: Assessing the Usability and Reusability of an E-Discovery Privilege Test Collection

In addition, Cheng Li says that the approach described in the following paper is applicable to legal information retrieval:

• Cheng Li, Yue Wang, Paul Resnick, and Qiaozhu Mei (all of the University of Michigan): ReQ-ReC: High Recall Retrieval with Query Pooling and Interactive Classification

For abstracts and full text of papers, please contact the authors.

If you know of other legal informatics papers or posters that have been accepted for the conference, please feel free to mention them in the comments to this post.

HT Cheng Li

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Conference papers, Research findings, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: ACM SIGIR, ACM SIGIR 2014, Automated classification of legal documents, Cheng Li, Douglas Oard, Douglas W. Oard, ediscovery, ediscovery and legal information retrieval, Electronic discovery, Gordon Cormack, Gordon V. Cormack, Jiaul Paik, Jyothi Vinjumur, Legal information retrieval, Legal machine learning, Legal search, Machine learning and ediscovery, Machine learning and law, Machine learning and legal information retrieval, Maura Grossman, Maura R. Grossman, Paul Resnick, Qiaozhu Mei, Technology assisted review in ediscovery, Yue Wang



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1nsTjTb

Zvenyach: Legal Markdown Editor, and other legal software and data resources at esq.io

V. David Zvenyach, Esq. has made available several new legal software and data tools:

1. Legal Markdown Editor , which David describes as follows:

Inspired by the ruby gem built by @compleatang, I wanted to build a javascript port of Legal Markdown

2. Several projects and resources at esq.io that were developed for use with the laws and legislative information of the municipal government of Washington, DC, USA, but might be adaptable for use in other jurisdictions, including:

• effdate (An effective-date calculator): http://ift.tt/1hmGpR9 [...]


• motions (Tracking Council motions): http://ift.tt/1gsMdxl [...]


• [...] better Hearing Notices [(in beta)]: http://ift.tt/1gsMdxn [...]


• Connecting District of Columbia Court of Appeals opinions to CourtListener

For more details, please see Legal Markdown Editor and esq.io .

HT @compleatang

Filed under: Applications, Software Tagged: Casey Kuhlman, Court decisions, CourtListener, Effective dates, esq.io, Hearing notices, Judicial decisions, Law practice technology, Legal date calculators, Legal document assembly systems, Legal Markdown Editor, legal-markdown, Legislative information management systems, Legislative information systems, Markdown and legal information, V. David Zvenyach



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/S7HGFb

Getman and Karasiuk: A crowdsourcing approach to building a legal ontology from text

Professor Dr. Anatoly P. Getman and Professor Volodymyr V. Karasiuk , both of Yaroslav National University, have published A crowdsourcing approach to building a legal ontology from text , forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law .

Here is the abstract:

This article focuses on the problems of application of artificial intelligence to represent legal knowledge. The volume of legal knowledge used in practice is unusually large, and therefore the ontological knowledge representation is proposed to be used for semantic analysis, presentation and use of common vocabulary, and knowledge integration of problem domain. At the same time some features of legal knowledge representation in Ukraine have been taken into account. The software package has been developed to work with the ontology. The main features of the program complex, which has a Web-based interface and supports multi-user filling of the knowledge base, have been described. The crowdsourcing method is due to be used for filling the knowledge base of legal information. The success of this method is explained by the self-organization principle of information. However, as a result of such collective work a number of errors are identified, which are distributed throughout the structure of the ontology. The results of application of this program complex are discussed in the end of the article and the ways of improvement of the considered technique are planned.

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Research findings, Technology developments Tagged: Anatoly Getman, Anatoly P. Getman, Artificial intelligence and law, Crowdsourcing in legal information systems, Crowdsourcing in legal ontology development, Development of legal ontologies, Development of legal ontologies and crowdsourcing, Legal crowdsourcing, Legal knowledge representation, Legal ontologies, Legal ontology development, Volodymyr Karasiuk, Volodymyr V. Karasiuk



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/S7HJ43

Legal informatics papers at CeDEM 14

Several papers on legal informatics were presented at CeDEM 14: International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2014, held 21-23 May 2014 at Danube University Krems, in Krems, Austria:

• Guido Boella, Llio Humpreys, Robert Muthuri, and Leendert van der Torre: Managing Legal Resources in Open Governance and E-Democracy: Eunomos: An Al and Law Response


• Aspasia Papaloi and Dimitris Gouscos: An Overview of Parliamentary Information Visualization (PIV) Initiatives: Assessing their Completeness and Contribution to Parliamentary Openness [click here for slides and notes] [click here for summary]


• Andrea Trentini and Fiorella De Cindio: A Layered Architecture to Model Digital Citizenship Rights and Opportunities [click here for summary]


• Wilfred Warioba and Abdallah Ally: Mobile Enhanced Human Rights Reporting – The Case of CHRAGG Tanzania [click here for summary]

For full text of papers, please contact the authors.

If you know of other legal informatics or legal communication papers presented at the conference, please feel free to identify them in the comments to this post.

Filed under: Applications, Conference resources, Slides, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Abdallah Ally, Andrea Trentini, Artificial intelligence and law, Aspasia Papaloi, CeDEM, CeDEM 14, CeDEM 2014, Constitutional law information systems, Dimitris Gouscos, Eunomos, Fiorella De Cindio, Guido Boella, Human rights communication systems, Human rights information systems, Human rights law communication systems, Human rights law information systems, International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, Leendert van der Torre, Legal communication, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge management, Legislative information systems, Llio Humpreys, Modeling legal rights, Parliamentary information visualization, PIV, Robert Muthuri, Visualization of legal information, Visualization of legislative information, Wilfred Warioba



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/SD7V76

Zvenyach: Legal Markdown Editor, and other legal software and data resources at esq.io

V. David Zvenyach, Esq. has made available several new legal software and data tools:

1. Legal Markdown Editor , which David describes as follows:

Inspired by the ruby gem built by @compleatang, I wanted to build a javascript port of Legal Markdown

2. Several projects and resources at esq.io that were developed for use with the laws and legislative information of the municipal government of Washington, DC, USA, but might be adaptable for use in other jurisdictions, including:

• effdate (An effective-date calculator): http://ift.tt/1hmGpR9 [...]


• motions (Tracking Council motions): http://ift.tt/1gsMdxl [...]


• [...] better Hearing Notices [(in beta)]: http://ift.tt/1gsMdxn [...]


• Connecting District of Columbia Court of Appeals opinions to CourtListener

For more details, please see Legal Markdown Editor and esq.io .

HT @compleatang

Filed under: Applications, Software Tagged: Casey Kuhlman, Court decisions, CourtListener, Effective dates, esq.io, Hearing notices, Judicial decisions, Law practice technology, Legal date calculators, Legal document assembly systems, Legal Markdown Editor, legal-markdown, Legislative information management systems, Legislative information systems, Markdown and legal information, V. David Zvenyach



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1gsMgsR

Getman and Karasiuk: A crowdsourcing approach to building a legal ontology from text

Professor Dr. Anatoly P. Getman and Professor Volodymyr V. Karasiuk , both of Yaroslav National University, have published A crowdsourcing approach to building a legal ontology from text , forthcoming in Artificial Intelligence and Law .

Here is the abstract:

This article focuses on the problems of application of artificial intelligence to represent legal knowledge. The volume of legal knowledge used in practice is unusually large, and therefore the ontological knowledge representation is proposed to be used for semantic analysis, presentation and use of common vocabulary, and knowledge integration of problem domain. At the same time some features of legal knowledge representation in Ukraine have been taken into account. The software package has been developed to work with the ontology. The main features of the program complex, which has a Web-based interface and supports multi-user filling of the knowledge base, have been described. The crowdsourcing method is due to be used for filling the knowledge base of legal information. The success of this method is explained by the self-organization principle of information. However, as a result of such collective work a number of errors are identified, which are distributed throughout the structure of the ontology. The results of application of this program complex are discussed in the end of the article and the ways of improvement of the considered technique are planned.

Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Research findings, Technology developments Tagged: Anatoly Getman, Anatoly P. Getman, Artificial intelligence and law, Crowdsourcing in legal information systems, Crowdsourcing in legal ontology development, Development of legal ontologies, Development of legal ontologies and crowdsourcing, Legal crowdsourcing, Legal knowledge representation, Legal ontologies, Legal ontology development, Volodymyr Karasiuk, Volodymyr V. Karasiuk



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/Sze9Vz

Legal informatics papers at CeDEM 14

Several papers on legal informatics were presented at CeDEM 14: International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2014, held 21-23 May 2014 at Danube University Krems, in Krems, Austria:

• Guido Boella, Llio Humpreys, Robert Muthuri, and Leendert van der Torre: Managing Legal Resources in Open Governance and E-Democracy: Eunomos: An Al and Law Response


• Aspasia Papaloi and Dimitris Gouscos: An Overview of Parliamentary Information Visualization (PIV) Initiatives: Assessing their Completeness and Contribution to Parliamentary Openness [click here for slides and notes] [click here for summary]


• Andrea Trentini and Fiorella De Cindio: A Layered Architecture to Model Digital Citizenship Rights and Opportunities [click here for summary]


• Wilfred Warioba and Abdallah Ally: Mobile Enhanced Human Rights Reporting – The Case of CHRAGG Tanzania [click here for summary]

For full text of papers, please contact the authors.

If you know of other legal informatics or legal communication papers presented at the conference, please feel free to identify them in the comments to this post.

Filed under: Applications, Conference resources, Slides, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Abdallah Ally, Andrea Trentini, Artificial intelligence and law, Aspasia Papaloi, CeDEM, CeDEM 14, CeDEM 2014, Constitutional law information systems, Dimitris Gouscos, Eunomos, Fiorella De Cindio, Guido Boella, Human rights communication systems, Human rights information systems, Human rights law communication systems, Human rights law information systems, International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, Leendert van der Torre, Legal communication, Legal informatics conferences, Legal knowledge management, Legislative information systems, Llio Humpreys, Modeling legal rights, Parliamentary information visualization, PIV, Robert Muthuri, Visualization of legal information, Visualization of legislative information, Wilfred Warioba



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1jNETgy

Carver: RECAP to be managed jointly by Free Law Project and CITP

Professor Brian Carver of Free Law Project announced on 19 May 2014 that the RECAP platform — which provides free public access to selected U.S. federal court documents — will be managed jointly by Free Law Project and Princeton’s Center for Information Technology Policy .

Here are excerpts from the announcement:

Today Free Law Project announced that it is partnering with Princeton University’s Center for Information Technology Policy to manage the operation and development of the RECAP platform. Most readers here will know that the RECAP platform utilizes free browser extensions to improve the experience of using PACER, the electronic public access system for U.S. federal courts, and crowdsources the creation of a free and open archive of public court records. [...]

RECAP is a perfect complement to Free Law Project’s existing efforts. The first version of CourtListener covered only the federal circuit courts and the Supreme Court of the United States. We’ve been working recently to roll out coverage of the courts of last resort in all the states (not quite there yet…) but have largely held off on tackling “the PACER problem” presented by the federal district courts. In part, we knew we could wait on this because RECAP was already addressing it about as well as anyone could. We have long assumed that we would at some point look to merge the RECAP documents with our existing documents, and knew because we focused on different courts, these would be largely complementary sets of documents. Well, the time to tackle that merger has arrived, and in the process we hope to provide a long-term home for RECAP maintenance and improvement. [...]

P.S. Please follow @RECAPtheLaw. We intend to start tweeting there.

See also, Steve Schultze’s post at Freedom to Tinker.

For more details, please see the complete announcement.

HT Pablo Arredondo

Filed under: Applications, Data sets, Projects, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Brian Carver, Center for Information Technology Policy, Free access to law, Free Law Project, Princeton CITP, Public access to court decisions, Public access to judicial decisions, Public access to legal information, RECAP, RECAP Archive, Stephen Schultze, Steve Schultze



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1p3lJVG