Professor Harry Surden of the University of Colorado has posted a video of his presentation entitled Computable Contracts , given 7 February 2014 at ReInvent Law NYC.
The video is available at ReInvent Law Channel , published by Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz and Professor Renee Newman Knake of the ReInvent Law Laboratory at Michigan State University.
The presentation is based on Professor Surden’s paper,
Computable Contracts , UC Davis Law Review , Vol. 46, pp. 629-700 (2012).
Here is the abstract:
It is possible to formulate contractual obligations so that computers can “understand” and make prima-facie compliance assessments with specified terms and conditions. Such a contractual obligation, formulated specifically for computer processability, is what this Article terms a “computable contract.” Computable contracts are not merely theoretical, but instead are increasingly being used in economically significant domains. Certain widely used financial contracts exemplify this model. The emergence of computable contracts has largely been unrecognized in the legal literature. However, computable contracting is not extensible across all, or even most, contracting scenarios. Rather, it is limited to a small subset of contracting scenarios involving standardization, and relative legal and factual certainty.
Drawing upon computer science research, this Article provides a theoretical account of computable contracting. It first explains how firms can communicate contracting information to computers by representing contracts as data instead of (or in addition to) the traditional written language form. Formalizing contractual obligations in this way is what is termed “data-oriented” contracting. The representation of contractual obligations as data, in turn, allows for novel contracting properties. For example, parties can effectively “translate” certain contractual criteria into a comparable set of computer-processable rules. To make contracts “computable”, parties provide computer systems with external data that is relevant to performance. This model is supported by contemporary examples of computable contracts in domains ranging from finance to intellectual property. This Article also provides principles for distinguishing contracting scenarios that are amenable to computability from those that are not.
Click here for other resources related to this work.
Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Presentations, Technology developments, Videos Tagged: Artificial intelligence and law, Computable contracts, Contract compliance systems, Contract information systems, Contract law information systems, Contracts as data, Contractual rules as data, Digital contracts, Electronic contracts, Harry Surden, Legal compliance systems, Legal rules as data, Modeling contract provisions, Modeling contracts, Modeling contractual obligations, Modeling legal rules, ReInvent Law NYC, UC Davis Law Review
via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1qcppGo
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu