Continue reading this article, and get more law firm business news and information, at FindLaw.com.
via Strategist http://ift.tt/1r8iKfM
Professor Harry Surden of the University of Colorado has posted Computable Contracts – Part 2 , at Concurring Opinions .
Here is a summary of the post:
This is the second part of a series explaining “computable contracts.” For more about what a computable contract is, please see the first part here.
[...] The goal of this second part is to explain the intuition behind how an ordinary contract can become a computable contract.
Three Steps to Computable Contracting
There are three steps to creating a computable contract:
- Data-Oriented Contracting
- Semantic Contract terms
- Automated assessment of contract terms
I will discuss each of these steps in turn. [...]
For details, please see the complete post.
Professor Dr. Paul Maharg of Australian National University has posted Emergent educational designs and distributed autonomous organisations , at his blog.
The post begins with comments on Kate Galloway, LL.M. ‘s earlier post: Legal education in a digital context .
Professor Maharg’s post continues:
[...] The nature of how we teach will change radically; and how will affect what. Problem-based learning, simulation, clinic are (to quote Lee Shulman) the shadow pedagogies that are slowly emerging from the shadows. But behind them, waiting to emerge, hand-in-hand with digital technologies, are even more shadowy, much more powerfully technologized and personal curriculum designs, which we need to understand and adapt.
What are these shadowy pedagogies? See for instance Eris – a platform for distributed autonomous organizations (DAOs) that use Ethereum blockchain technologies. [...] In the WG Hart presentation a few days ago I summarised some of the uses of this open technology [...] In legal education, a blockchained environment might include learning objects, a comms system, a badge system (eg Mozilla Badges), a payment system, access to knowledge and skills environments and other decentralised functions. Decentralisation — what’s the role of the LMS then? I’d guess that we’re already moving away from it, and blockchained legal education will probably render it unwieldy, pointless.
More fundamentally, and given disintermediation, what does this do to the nature, role and status of the law school as educational institution? And how should this be regulated? We have papers on Bitcoin regulation to use as a model, but we need much more imaginative thinking, and we need to do that with regulators, as I argued at the WG Hart Workshop, and bring them with us in our thinking. Above all, we need to do it for ourselves and our students, so that we can greet the technologies as they emerge from the shadows, and draw them into the endless educational conversation, glancing awhile at the figures behind them, waiting their turn to emerge into the light.
For more details, please see the complete post.
Professor Harry Surden of the University of Colorado has posted Computable Contracts – Part 2 , at Concurring Opinions .
Here is a summary of the post:
This is the second part of a series explaining “computable contracts.” For more about what a computable contract is, please see the first part here.
[...] The goal of this second part is to explain the intuition behind how an ordinary contract can become a computable contract.
Three Steps to Computable Contracting
There are three steps to creating a computable contract:
- Data-Oriented Contracting
- Semantic Contract terms
- Automated assessment of contract terms
I will discuss each of these steps in turn. [...]
For details, please see the complete post.
Professor Dr. Paul Maharg of Australian National University has posted Emergent educational designs and distributed autonomous organisations .
The post begins by commenting on Professor Kate Galloway’s earlier post on technology in legal education.
Here are excerpts from Professor Maharg’s post:
[...] The nature of how we teach will change radically; and how will affect what. Problem-based learning, simulation, clinic are (to quote Lee Shulman) the shadow pedagogies that are slowly emerging from the shadows. But behind them, waiting to emerge, hand-in-hand with digital technologies, are even more shadowy, much more powerfully technologized and personal curriculum designs, which we need to understand and adapt.
What are these shadowy pedagogies? See for instance Eris – a platform for distributed autonomous organizations (DAOs) that use Ethereum blockchain technologies. [...] In the WG Hart presentation a few days ago I summarised some of the uses of this open technology [...] In legal education, a blockchained environment might include learning objects, a comms system, a badge system (eg Mozilla Badges), a payment system, access to knowledge and skills environments and other decentralised functions. Decentralisation — what’s the role of the LMS then? I’d guess that we’re already moving away from it, and blockchained legal education will probably render it unwieldy, pointless.
More fundamentally, and given disintermediation, what does this do to the nature, role and status of the law school as educational institution? And how should this be regulated? We have papers on Bitcoin regulation to use as a model, but we need much more imaginative thinking, and we need to do that with regulators, as I argued at the WG Hart Workshop, and bring them with us in our thinking. Above all, we need to do it for ourselves and our students, so that we can greet the technologies as they emerge from the shadows, and draw them into the endless educational conversation, glancing awhile at the figures behind them, waiting their turn to emerge into the light.
For more details, please see the complete post.
The conference was preceded by Tech for Justice Hackathon , held 21-22 June 2014 in San Francisco.
The conference Website is at: http://www.odr2014.org/
The conference agenda is available at: http://ift.tt/1j4EPUH
Videos of some conference events are available at: http://ift.tt/1pLbvIM
Click here for slides of many of the presentations, and some photos of conference events [HT @peteyreplies].
Click here for a liveblog of the conference, by Chris Peterson at MIT Center for Civic Media.
The Twitter hashtag for the event appears to be: #odr2014
The Twitter account for the conference appears to be @ODR2014Forum
Click here for a storify of photos and Twitter tweets from the conference.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the conference, in .csv format.
HT @jaxhead
The conference Website is at: http://www.odr2014.org/
The conference agenda is available at: http://ift.tt/1j4EPUH
Livestream video of the conference is available at: http://ift.tt/1pLbvIM
Click here to register for livestream video from the conference.
Click here for slides of many of the presentations, and some photos of conference events [HT @peteyreplies].
Click here for a liveblog of the conference, by Chris Peterson at MIT Center for Civic Media.
The Twitter hashtag for the event appears to be: #odr2014
The Twitter account for the conference appears to be @ODR2014Forum
Click here for a storify of photos and Twitter tweets from the conference.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the conference, in .csv format.
For more resources related to this conference, please see the comments to this post.
HT @jaxhead
Click here for the event Website and agenda.
The organizers say that video of the event will be available at some future date.
The Twitter hashtag for the event was #legalhack
Click here for a storify of photos and Twitter tweets from the event.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the event, in .csv format.
Here is the list of speakers, from the event’s Website:
- Noah Waisberg – DiligenceEngine
- Jules Miller – Hire An Esquire
- Harris Brown – Shake
- Nehal Madhani – plainlegal
- Paige Zandri – Priori Legal
- Peter Rood – Distributed Justice
- Jared Brenner – What If Wiki
- Howard Greenstein & David Mitnick – DomainSkate
- Irina Tsukerman – Justat
- Matthew Burnett & Tony Lu – CitizenshipWorks
For more details, please see the event’s Website.
The conference was preceded by Tech for Justice Hackathon , held 21-22 June 2014 in San Francisco.
The conference Website is at: http://www.odr2014.org/
The conference agenda is available at: http://ift.tt/1j4EPUH
Videos of some conference events are available at: http://ift.tt/1pLbvIM
Click here for slides of many of the presentations, and some photos of conference events [HT @peteyreplies].
Click here for a liveblog of the conference, by Chris Peterson at MIT Center for Civic Media.
The Twitter hashtag for the event appears to be: #odr2014
The Twitter account for the conference appears to be @ODR2014Forum
Click here for a storify of photos and Twitter tweets from the conference.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the conference, in .csv format.
HT @jaxhead
The conference Website is at: http://www.odr2014.org/
The conference agenda is available at: http://ift.tt/1j4EPUH
Click here to register for livestream video from the conference.
The Twitter hashtag for the event appears to be: #odr2014
HT @jaxhead
Click here for the event Website and agenda.
The organizers say that video of the event will be available at some future date.
The Twitter hashtag for the event was #legalhack
Click here for a storify of photos and Twitter tweets from the event.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the event, in .csv format.
Here is the list of speakers, from the event’s Website:
- Noah Waisberg – DiligenceEngine
- >Jules Miller – Hire An Esquire
- Harris Brown – Shake
- Nehal Madhani – plainlegal
- Paige Zandri – Priori Legal
- Peter Rood – Distributed Justice
- Jared Brenner – What If Wiki
- Howard Greenstein & David Mitnick – DomainSkate
- Irina Tsukerman – Justat
- Matthew Burnett & Tony Lu – CitizenshipWorks
For more details, please see the event’s Website.
Dr. Margaret Hagan of Stanford University has posted The Guardianship Navigator Project at the blog of the Program for Legal Tech + Design .
Here are excerpts from the post:
Welcome to the project page for the Guardianship Navigator Project . We are designing new services and products to help a lay person navigate a Guardianship action.
Our group at Stanford is working with court staff & self-help center directors to revise the current process that users must go through, to make it easier to understand and get a successful resolution. We are using a human-centered design process to generate breakthrough ideas and make sure they will be usable, useful, and engaging for the users.
This page will document the ideas our design process generates, as well as the process itself. Please leave comments if you have feedback or ideas. [...]
We ran a Participatory Design Sprint in May with court staff, technologists and designers to source ideas. [...]
Below, find a categorized groupings of some of the ideas that emerged out of the brainstorms & discussions. [...]
For more details and images, please see the complete post.
Attorney Tom Johnson has posted a video entitled Ethereum contracts as legal contracts , as part of the EtherCasts video series on YouTube .
The video is the subject of a new post by Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz at Computational Legal Studies: Ethereum contracts as legal contracts .
Here is a description of the video:
Tom Johnson describes the conditions under which an Ethereum or other smart contract can be a legal contract. Tom is a patent attorney in San Jose who has written on Bitcoin.
Johnson also appears to attend the Silicon Valley Ethereum Meetup.
Click here for other posts about legal applications of blockchain technology.
HT Jurix
Tech for Justice Hackathon, at Online Dispute Resolution Forum 2014, was held 21-22 June 2014, at Code for America’s offices, in San Francisco, California, USA.
Video of some presentations at Day 1 of the event is at: http://ift.tt/1pLbvIM
The Website for the event, with agenda, is at: http://ift.tt/1liLaRc
Click here for the registration page and the conference schedule.
The Twitter hashtags for the event appear to be #techforjustice and #hackthelaw
The Twitter account for the event appears to be @techforjustice
Click here for a storify of Twitter tweets and photos from the event.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from Days 1 and 2 of the event, in .csv format.
Here is a description of the event from the registration page:
[...] ODR2014 is proud to host the first ever dispute resolution hackathon, where participants will spend the weekend of June 21-22nd tackling problems within [several] thematic areas, and produce prototypes that will be curated and presented to audiences at ODR2014’s UC Hastings event. [...]
Here are the thematic areas that are listed on the registration page:
- collaborative economy
- privacy
- cyberbullying & harassment
- healthcare dispute management
- environment – reporting and acting on environmental abuse through crowdsourcing mechanisms
- intellectual property
- landlord & tenancy – housing issues
Projects developed at the event are scheduled to be presented again at ODR 2014 on 25 June.
For more details, please see the event Website.
Dr. Margaret Hagan of Stanford University has posted The Guardianship Navigator Project at the blog of the Program for Legal Tech + Design .
Here are excerpts from the post:
Welcome to the project page for the Guardianship Navigator Project . We are designing new services and products to help a lay person navigate a Guardianship action.
Our group at Stanford is working with court staff & self-help center directors to revise the current process that users must go through, to make it easier to understand and get a successful resolution. We are using a human-centered design process to generate breakthrough ideas and make sure they will be usable, useful, and engaging for the users.
This page will document the ideas our design process generates, as well as the process itself. Please leave comments if you have feedback or ideas. [...]
We ran a Participatory Design Sprint in May with court staff, technologists and designers to source ideas. [...]
Below, find a categorized groupings of some of the ideas that emerged out of the brainstorms & discussions. [...]
For more details and images, please see the complete post.
Attorney Tom Johnson has posted a video entitled Ethereum contracts as legal contracts , as part of the EtherCasts video series on YouTube .
The video is the subject of a new post by Professor Dr. Daniel Martin Katz at Computational Legal Studies: Ethereum contracts as legal contracts .
Here is a description of the video:
Tom Johnson describes the conditions under which an Ethereum or other smart contract can be a legal contract. Tom is a patent attorney in San Jose who has written on Bitcoin.
Johnson also appears to attend the Silicon Valley Ethereum Meetup.
Click here for other posts about legal applications of blockchain technology.
HT Jurix
Tech for Justice Hackathon, at Online Dispute Resolution Forum 2014, was held 21-22 June 2014, at Code for America’s offices, in San Francisco, California, USA.
Video of some presentations at Day 1 of the event is at: http://ift.tt/1j4EMZ4
The Website for the event, with agenda, is at: http://ift.tt/1liLaRc
Click here for the registration page and the conference schedule.
The Twitter hashtags for the event appear to be #techforjustice and #hackthelaw
The Twitter account for the event appears to be @techforjustice
Click here for a storify of Twitter tweets and photos from the event.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from Days 1 and 2 of the event, in .csv format.
Here is a description of the event from the registration page:
[...] ODR2014 is proud to host the first ever dispute resolution hackathon, where participants will spend the weekend of June 21-22nd tackling problems within [several] thematic areas, and produce prototypes that will be curated and presented to audiences at ODR2014’s UC Hastings event. [...]
Here are the thematic areas that are listed on the registration page:
- collaborative economy
- privacy
- cyberbullying & harassment
- healthcare dispute management
- environment – reporting and acting on environmental abuse through crowdsourcing mechanisms
- intellectual property
- landlord & tenancy – housing issues
Projects developed at the event are scheduled to be presented again at ODR 2014 on 25 June.
For more details, please see the event Website.
CALICon 2014: Conference for Law School Computing, was held 19-21 June 2014 at Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
The conference Website is at: http://ift.tt/1noA8aX
Videos from the event will be posted in the coming weeks.
The conference program with abstracts is at: http://ift.tt/1o5pOZh
The conference blog is at: http://ift.tt/1p8ZO0Q
Twitter hashtags for the conference include #calicon14 and #calicon2014
Click here for a storify of Twitter tweets and photos from the event.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the event, in .csv format.
HT @rgranat
Professor Dr. Pompeu Casanovas and Professor Dr. Immaculada Barral Viñals , have co-edited a special issue on “Legal XML and Online Dispute Resolution,” of Revista Democracia Digital e Governo Eletrônico , no. 10 (2014).
Here is a description of the issue, from the editors’ introductory essay:
[...] We have divided this edition into three parts: (y) Law, Governance and Technology; (ii) Legal XML in context; (iii) Crowdsourcing and Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). [...]
In the first part of the Section, we have grouped some articles focusing on the broader aspects of the relationship between law and technology [...]
The second part of the Section focuses on eXtended Markup Language (XML) for law, or more concisely, Legal XML. This markup language is used to structure metadata of a document (author, content, origin …) and is complemented by the so-called XML-schema, a language which is a W3C standard since 2001 and used to express some constraints on the documents. [...]
The third section, Mediation, ODR and Crowdsourcing, contain the largest body of papers. It is strictly related to the current state of the art. There are some recent collective contributions in this specific field, which reflect discussions at the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and at the European Parliament [...]
For more details, please see the issue.
Tech for Justice Hackathon, at Online Dispute Resolution Forum 2014, is being held 21-22 June 2014, at Code for America’s offices, in San Francisco, California, USA.
Video of some presentations at Day 1 of the event is at: http://ift.tt/1j4EMZ4
The Website for the event is at: http://ift.tt/1liLaRc
Click here for the registration page and the conference schedule.
The Twitter hashtags for the event appear to be #techforjustice and hackthelaw
The Twitter account for the event appears to be @techforjustice
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from Days 1 and 2 of the event, in .csv format.
Here is a description of the event from the registration page:
[...] ODR2014 is proud to host the first ever dispute resolution hackathon, where participants will spend the weekend of June 21-22nd tackling problems within [several] thematic areas, and produce prototypes that will be curated and presented to audiences at ODR2014’s UC Hastings event. [...]
Here are the thematic areas that are listed on the registration page:
- collaborative economy
- privacy
- cyberbullying & harassment
- healthcare dispute management
- environment – reporting and acting on environmental abuse through crowdsourcing mechanisms
- intellectual property
- landlord & tenancy – housing issues
Projects developed at the event are scheduled to be presented again at ODR 2014 on 25 June.
For more details, please see the registration page.
ReInvent Law London 2014 , a conference featuring presentations on "law + technology + innovation + entrepreneurship," was held 20 June 2014, at the University of Westminster Law School in London.
The conference was organized by Professor Renee Newman Knake of Michigan State University College of Law, and Professor Dr. Lisa Webley of the University of Westminster.
The conference Website is at: reinventlawlondon.com/
The conference speakers are listed at: http://ift.tt/Td9RDf
The conference schedule is at: http://ift.tt/Td9RDg
The Twitter hashtags for the event include #reinventlaw and #reinventlawlondon
Click here for a storify of Twitter tweets and photos from the conference.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the conference, in .csv format.
Information about the conference is also being posted on the ReInvent Law Lab’s Twitter feed: @ReInventLaw
For more resources about this event, please see the comments to this post.
HT @ReInventLaw
ReInvent Law London 2014 , a conference featuring presentations on "law + technology + innovation + entrepreneurship," is being held 20 June 2014, at the University of Westminster Law School.
The conference has been organized by Professor Renee Newman Knake of Michigan State University College of Law, and Professor Dr. Lisa Webley of the University of Westminster.
The conference speakers are listed at: http://ift.tt/Td9RDf
The conference schedule is at: http://ift.tt/Td9RDg
The Twitter hashtags for the event include #reinventlaw and #reinventlawlondon
Information about the conference is also being posted on the ReInvent Law Lab’s Twitter feed: @ReInventLaw
Click here for a storify of Twitter tweets and photos from the conference.
Click here for archived Twitter tweets from the conference, in .csv format.
HT @ReInventLaw
CALICon 2014: Conference for Law School Computing, is being held 19-21 June 2014 at Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
The conference Website is at: http://ift.tt/1noA8aX
Some conference events are being webcast live, at links on the conference Website.
The conference program with abstracts is at: http://ift.tt/1o5pOZh
Twitter hashtags for the conference include #calicon14 and #calicon2014
HT @rgranat