The new issue of Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (volume 10, issue 4) contains several articles on legal decision making or legal communication:
- Bryan C. McCannon: Prosecutor Elections, Mistakes, and Appeals
- Frank McIntyre, Shima Baradaran: Race, Prediction, and Pretrial Detention
- Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Robert M. Lawless: Bankrupt Apologies
- Dan Simon and Nicholas Scurich: The Effect of Legal Expert Commentary on Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making
- Jeff Yates, Damon M. Cann, Brent D. Boyea: Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication
Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Research findings Tagged: Bankruptcy law information systems, Bias in judges' legal decisionmaking, Citizens' attitudes towards court decisions, Citizens' attitudes towards judicial decisions, Citizens' opinions about court decisions, Citizens' opinions about judicial decisions, Communication in bankruptcy cases, Ideology and judges' legal decisionmaking, Influence of ideology on judges' legal decisionmaking, Influence of ideology on judicial case selection, Influence of legal experts, Influence of legal experts in the media, Influence of legal journalists, Influence of legal media commentators, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Judges' legal decisionmaking, Judicial case selection, Judicial information systems, Lawyers' legal decisionmaking, Legal apologies, Legal communication, Legal decisionmaking, Legal experts, Legal journalism, Media effects of legal commentary, Media effects of legal experts, Media effects of legal journalism, Prosecutors' legal decisionmaking, Racial bias in judges' legal decisionmaking
via Legal Informatics Blog http://legalinformatics.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/papers-on-legal-decision-making-or-legal-communication-in-new-issue-of-journal-of-empirical-legal-studies/
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu