Professor Scott Dodson of the University of California Hastings and Profesor Colin Starger of the University of Baltimore have published Mapping Supreme Court Doctrine: Civil Pleading , Federal Courts Law Review , 7, 275-284 (2014).
The article, and the video on which it is based, have been posted to SSRN .
Here is the abstract:
This essay, adapted from the video presentation available on Vimeo as #89845875, graphically depicts the genealogy and evolution of federal civil pleading standards in U.S. Supreme Court opinions over time. We show that the standard narrative — of a decline in pleading liberality from Conley to Twombly to Iqbal — is complicated by both progenitors and progeny. We therefore offer a fuller picture of the doctrine of Rule 8 pleading that ought to be of use to judges and practitioners in federal court. We also hope, through the video presentation, to introduce a new visual format for academic scholarship that capitalizes on the virtues of narration, graphics, mapping, online accessibility, and electronic dissemination.
This is an interesting example of the use of SSRN‘s video display capability.
Click here for previous posts about Colin Starger’s research using the SCOTUS Mapper Software.
Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Research findings, Technology developments, Technology tools, Videos Tagged: Argument mapping and law, Argument maps and law, Civil procedure information systems, Colin Starger, Constitutional law information systems, Darren Kumasawa, Iqbal doctrine, Legal argument mapping, Legal argument mapping software, Legal argument maps, Legal doctrine maps, Mapping Civil Pleading, Mapping legal arguments, Mapping legal doctrines, Mapping legal rules, Mapping Supreme Court Doctrine: Civil Pleading, Scott Dodson, SCOTUS Mapper Software, SCOTUS Mapping Project, SSRN videos, Supreme Court Mapping Project, Twombly doctrine, Twombly Iqbal caselaw, Twombly Iqbal doctrine, Videos on SSRN, Visualization of court information, Visualization of judicial information, Visualization of legal argumentation, Visualization of legal arguments, Visualization of legal doctrine, Visualization of legal information
via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1gSa8Rm
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu