joi, 24 iulie 2014

Katz, Bommarito, and Blackman: Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach

Daniel Martin Katz , Michael Bommarito , and Josh Blackman , have posted a working paper entitled Predicting the Behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States: A General Approach .


Here is the abstract:



Building upon developments in theoretical and applied machine learning, as well as the efforts of various scholars including Guimera and Sales-Pardo (2011), Ruger et al. (2004), and Martin et al. (2004), we construct a model designed to predict the voting behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States. Using the extremely randomized tree method first proposed in Geurts et al. (2006), a method similar to the random forest approach developed in Breiman (2001), as well as novel feature engineering, we predict more than sixty years of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States (1953-2013). Using only data available prior to the date of decision, our model correctly identifies 69.7% of the Court’s overall affirm and reverse decisions and correctly forecasts 70.9% of the votes of individual justices across 7,700 cases and more than 68,000 justice votes. Our performance is consistent with the general level of prediction offered by prior scholars. However, our model is distinctive as it is the first robust, generalized, and fully predictive model of Supreme Court voting behavior offered to date. Our model predicts six decades of behavior of thirty Justices appointed by thirteen Presidents. With a more sound methodological foundation, our results represent a major advance for the science of quantitative legal prediction and portend a range of other potential applications, such as those described in Katz (2013).



HT @computational




Filed under: Applications, Articles and papers, Research findings Tagged: Daniel Martin Katz, Extremely randomized tree method, Josh Blackman, Judges' legal decision making, Judges' legal decisionmaking, Legal decisionmaking, Legal prediction, Legal prediction and machine learning, Machine learning and law, Machine learning and legal prediction, Michael Bommarito, Michael J Bommarito II, Quantitative legal prediction, Random forest, Randomized tree method, Statistical methods in legal informatics, U.S. Supreme Court



via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/WMuQPt

Niciun comentariu:

Trimiteți un comentariu