Colin Starger of the University of Baltimore has opened a new blog about his U.S. Supreme Court Mapping Project, called In Progress.
Here are excerpts from the first post:
In the 10/20 Map of the Week, I quickly rendered an immigration network. To make it, I combined two 3-degree citation network. Both networks started with 2010′s Padilla v. Kentucky as a child. Padilla’s two network parents were the Chinese Exclusion Case (1889) and Fong Yue Ting (1892). I then filtered this combined two-parent network to opinions containing the word “immigration.” The resulting map looked like this: [...]
Note that this look of the network employs a Spaeth visualization. Unfortunately, Spaeth only goes back to 1946. Many of the cases in immigration doctrine are much older. Thus our immigration problem: The y-axis is meaningless for the cases plotted in green.
First project then is to rehab this map by inserting proper vote counts pre-1946. I’ll have to count votes by hand. Of course, this fix won’t solve all our immigration problems. But it will help and is a fair first step. Will report back on that step and on future steps in the next post. [...]
The latest post from the blog is called Immigration Solution (Part II): Identifying Opinion Authors .
The project Website is at: http://ift.tt/1cT7sX1
Click here for other posts about the project.
Filed under: Applications, Blogs, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Colin Starger, In Progress, Judicial citation networks, Judicial information systems, Legal citation networks, SCOTUS Mapper Software, SCOTUS Mapper Software 2.0, Visualization of court decisions, Visualization of judicial citation networks, Visualization of judicial decisions, Visualization of judicial doctrine, Visualization of judicial information, Visualization of legal citation networks, Visualization of legal information
via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/10wG5g2
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu