The event is organized by Seattle Legal Innovation and Technology Meetup.
Here is a description of the event, from the announcement:
For September, we’ve lined up academics doing some of the most interesting things in legal education sharing what they’re doing and their experiences pushing the envelope in an environment that’s generally resistant to change. Here are our panelists, their affiliations and what they’ll be sharing with us:
Ryan Calo – UW Law School – Talking about his class Robotics, Law, and Policy (http://ift.tt/XSs8aY) that has an emphasis on law schools. It’s a deeply interdisciplinary seminar running for the third year this spring.
Tanina Rostain – Talking about the Iron Tech Law Program at Georgetown Law in which student teams show off apps built in our Technology Innovation and Law Practice practicum.
Dazza Greenwood – Legal Scientist at the MIT Media Lab. Yes, MIT. Yes, he’s a lawyer working there. No, MIT doesn’t have a law school. Dazza works in Sandy Pentland’s Human Dynamics laboratory and is pursuing some very innovative projects in the privacy and open data spaces.
This will be a fascinating look at the some cutting edge projects and pedagogical techniques in the law. [...]
For more details, please see the announcement.
Filed under: Applications, Conference Announcements, Policy debates, Technology developments, Technology tools Tagged: Artificial intelligence and law, Computational Legal Studies, Dan Lear, Dazza Greenwood, Iron Tech Lawyer Competition, Legal education reform, Legal educational technology, Legal expert systems, Legal informatics in legal education, Legal instructional technology, MIT Legal Physics Research Team, Robotics and law, Robots and law, Ryan Calo, Seattle Legal Innovation and Technology MeetUp, Tanina Rostain, Technology in legal education
via Legal Informatics Blog http://ift.tt/1rktMOz
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu